full cascading?
Most modern graphical user interfaces (GUIs) imitated Windows 3 (win3) then 95/98/ME (and/or classic-to-current Apple) but dropped most win3, some win95 style: unfortunate because some was faster (more productive). I know XFCE forked CDE which had imitated win3 (wish I could have program manager/groups back) but more recently win95 with some worse (XP/Vista/7/8/10?) updates: replaced full (onscreen) cascading with partial (offscreen/scroll) cascading which can take users much more time. If a main GUI (start/applications) menu box had submenu longer than screen, it 'cascaded' a new column still onscreen (you maybe can find such win95 or (unsure) win98 screenshots, but I'll find/post if you can't); what used to take a couple seconds full cascading now can take several to 10+ seconds with inferior partial cascading (on GUIs more popular but slower than XFCE I've even given up & exited when was taking minutes to scroll... similarly some I know use XFCE3 or older or speed and/or preferred style).
I (and users whose PCs I administer) would like full cascading back because we have submenus twice 4K (and maybe four times their 1200p) screen height and will of course be installing much more in future... partial cascading just doesn't cut it (is an absolutely inferior total time-wasting useless graphic design animation effect trend/fad... onet thing I hated about KDE was excess effects/animations which one could disable all at once but now has to disable dozens one-by-one... absolutely no effect/animation should be forced including main GUI/applications menu scrolling, which I seem to recall comes from later 'cholesterol-style' Windows).